Saturday, May 19, 2012   
  Search   
 
Register  Login  
Home  
INTJ Invasion
Last Post 21 Mar 2011 07:16 AM by Sakari. 55 Replies.
'; AddThis - Bookmarking and Sharing Button Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 3 << < 123
Author Messages
Danny User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Both Apply
Relationship: Amicable
IM: IM, IM, IM . . Blonde!
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Posts:290
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 01:36 AM  
Here is your @#$%@#$% hammock, Mr. Monkey, per your demand.

*storms off*
"She parts bullshit like the red sea. Amen." ~TheMorrigan to Danny
TheMorrigan User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: F
Relationship: Single
IM:
Posts:55
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 01:37 AM  
*hopes she doesn't accidentally eats a pea* *chomps*
Danny User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Both Apply
Relationship: Amicable
IM: IM, IM, IM . . Blonde!
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Posts:290
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 01:39 AM  
*hands theMorrigan a pillow*

Here's your pillow for the luau TheMorrigan.

The Monkey *demanded* a hammock!!

*listens to the ukeleles*
"She parts bullshit like the red sea. Amen." ~TheMorrigan to Danny
caprice User is Offline
MBTI: eNfP
Age/Sex: F
Relationship:
IM:
High Author
High Author
Posts:782
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 01:49 AM  

I rarely point out inconsistencies in an INTJs argument. And they are sometimes inconsistent. Why do I do that? Because I, as an ENFP, choose to find common ground and IT DOESN"T MATTER. At least not to an ENFP. It's nice for an INTJ to have a mutual concern and priority. The INTJs here prior to your invasion have demonstrated that they can consider an ENFPs emotional perspective before they speak. Not because we're always right emotionally, but because it means something to us. Degrading comments are cheap and lacking in integrity.

Danny User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Both Apply
Relationship: Amicable
IM: IM, IM, IM . . Blonde!
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Posts:290
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 02:08 AM  
You are still failing to be direct, Caprice. That's not to say I don't understand you, but I think you should be direct.

My perception is this: as a few of us have come here with all benign and sincere intentions, our playfulness may have been surprising to some. It seems to me, that there have been a few that have come and poked and prodded us with sticks, criticized not-so-subtly, to which we have responded with our best humor.

Tooboku, the issue in this thread, came in, introduced himself in a very jovial fashion, and he has been shot down. He has attempted to reply with humor, which also seems to me to say "Hey! Be nice! Or, I'll push back."

If, Caprice, the intention is to assign the worst of intentions to new faces when the playfulness is not understood, then why be surprised when the object of the negative projection smarts. I think tooboku has handled himself well. If someone takes offense at his playful post, then it is hardly integrable to attack him with sarcasm rather than to cooly state that one was offended--OR, ignore the thread if it can't be handled better.

If the intention is to drive out INTJs by popping in with biting comments here and there--I am sure that "drive out" will be more than successful.

I am "speculating", so, again, Caprice, I am asking you to be direct.
"She parts bullshit like the red sea. Amen." ~TheMorrigan to Danny
Sakari User is Offline
MBTI: ENFP
Age/Sex: Female
Relationship: Single
IM: sakariparadox
Cutest ENFP Ninja
Moderator
Moderator
Posts:753
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 10:47 AM  
I would like to state that tooboku's comments, while sarcastic, were also quite hurtful. Saying things like "no thanks, I wouldn't want you to be in my army" implies something very hurtful, and I don't see how lindzmarie deserved this kind of response. While it could be taken as sarcasm, saying "I wouldn't have you in my army anyway, I want someone with better eyes" is nothing less than a rejection, coupled with degradation of one's worth. There was originally humor, as seen in the first post with the 90 virgins comment--however, the humor quickly ran out when the comments resorted to belittling a forum member. I, and I believe caprice will echo my sentiment, do not condone this type of behavior. I would like to suggest that tooboku apologize to lindzmarie for either intentionally or unintentionally mocking her.

Caprice has stated she will step back from this behavior because she takes an ENFP's feelings into account. I would like to jump off from her statement--I hope that all forum members will note that one of our forum rules is "Thou shalt not be a jerk." Even if it was only intended as banter, the intent is overriden when it ends in an attack on someone's person and worth, as seen here. For clarification in this case, the attack is best stated as "You're not good enough to be in my army"--and I hope you can see how this counts as a personal attack. Wit and sarcasm is very much encouraged; however, I think we are all clever enough banter without resorting to this kind of thing.
Danny User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Both Apply
Relationship: Amicable
IM: IM, IM, IM . . Blonde!
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Posts:290
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 01:19 PM  
Sakari, there is no disagreement from me that tooboku's "push back" to lindzmarie could be taken hurtfully, but I do want to back up here. Something about this whole thing really bothers me:

Tooboku posted playfully in his original post. Caprice was the first to respond. When I read it then and re-read it just now, I choke. I find it, to borrow Caprice's words regarding what she disapproves of, to be "mean spirited". She also states that she rarely points out consistencies in INTJs. She also states she doesn't approve of degrading another human being, especially one she likes. And yet the inconsistency that I find is her mean-spirited tone in the very first reply to tooboku seems to have set a tone, where by her friend heard the rally cry and responded. I see other posters that have ignored these slights and tried to carry on in good spirit and humor, and then there is another mean spirited post.

While tooboku's response can be taken as hurtful, it was a response in kind, however at least it was playful and in keeping with the a silly persona, thus it could have been left alone.

It is clear that Caprice's, lindzmarie's, and Trance Cit's posts were biting. I don't find a single post in this thread from Caprice that was not biting. I note these posts quite differently from the playful jest of Nick, Rogarn and Optimaler.

For goodness sake, this is a welcome thread. I think it would have been better for these biting posts from these three posters to have not been posted. Debate about playful jest to collect 90 virgins could have been in a debate thread, not a welcome thread. I hardly believe that tooboku would have responded the way he did had he not had three posters being so "unwelcoming". At least he was still playful; it could have been addressed in kind.


"She parts bullshit like the red sea. Amen." ~TheMorrigan to Danny
PurpleGiraffe User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: 28/F
Relationship: Jirafa sola
IM:
Philosopher of ENFPs
Philosopher of ENFPs
Posts:962
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 02:11 PM  

Danny, I'm quite certain that Caprice's first post was in full jest. She was joking that virgins wouldn't be found here. They would be found in the ISFJ forum. It is a funny joke, because there is some truth to it. Sometimes Caprice, as she has said previously, will forget to include emoticons but Caprice's humor is pretty consistent and easy to determine if you've been around her long enough, and I'm quite certain that Caprice would back it up saying that she was merely being facetious.

Conversely, I'm also quite certain that lindzmarie was just responding in jest, indicating that ESFPs were better able to be brainwashed.

And Trance City, well...we love Trance City. She was just responding to the portion about "Rogarn's pebbles" and the "that's what she said" joke because she has previously indicated a dislike for sex and sexual topics.

Everyone around here tends to joke quite a bit. Whether we should have done it quite so much in a welcome forum is another matter, but I don't believe anyone meant any harm - just playful banter. It seems to me that Caprice only became more harsh after the comments that seemed to denegrate/attack Lindzmarie personally, because I've been here quite awhile and I've never seen Caprice get upset unless it was in defense of another.
 

We certainly want to welcome all of your crew.  We like having you around, and I personally apologize because we probably should have been more "welcoming" in the "welcome thread" but as Sakari pointed out, we also stick to the notion that one should "not be a jerk."

Danny User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Both Apply
Relationship: Amicable
IM: IM, IM, IM . . Blonde!
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Posts:290
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 02:21 PM  
Purple Giraffe, thank you for your input. Perhaps your post is the best in this regard:

You see the humor in Caprice's post; I remember reading it and physically reeling. I did again when I re-read it. I did not find humor in it. (*Wait!* Stay with me . . ) I also reeled a bit when I read tooboku's reply to lindzmarie--I did find humor in it.

This is where the enlightenment comes in: you know certain posters enough that you don't find sting in their posts, but only humor. I know certain posters enough that I find their humor (and sting IF it is intended). So, perhaps it is a matter of familiarity and getting to know one another.

Having said that, I will say that I have perceived pricks and pokes and prods and stings, for what purpose, I don't know. I have done my best to ignore the slights, but they were felt.

I come back to this being a welcome thread. I do hope tooboku will return and I do hope that we will all have engaging, enlightening, and stimulating conversation with one another, playful jest, too.

*heads to review the threads on sarcasm, sarcausm, animal chatter, and so you wanna take your ball and go home . . .* *wonders to self if the common theme and intention is missed . . .*
"She parts bullshit like the red sea. Amen." ~TheMorrigan to Danny
caprice User is Offline
MBTI: eNfP
Age/Sex: F
Relationship:
IM:
High Author
High Author
Posts:782
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 10:32 PM  
Purple Giraffe was exactly right in her interpretation of my intention and meaning in my original reply. I also concur with her take on the other two posts in question.

When you lead with banter, sarcasm etc...[read OP] it's likely that some will join in.

Or, metaphorically, if you start a snowball fight, some people are going to throw snowballs back. It seems odd to take offense at that, or to complain about getting hit by snowballs when you've hit others. And there are ground rules for any game.

But I may have been premature in engaging in banter here. I'm sorry if I offended or hurt anyone. That wasn't my intention.

optimaler User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ (1w9)
Age/Sex: 24/M
Relationship: There are mostly evil things, but some good things
IM:
Senior Editor
Senior Editor
Posts:407
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 10:42 PM  
huh.
Cooper User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Old has dirt male
Relationship:
IM:
Posts:46
Avatar

--
18 Mar 2011 11:31 PM  
I just read every post in this thread. For what its worth, Tooboku's post crossed the line, especially for an intro thread.
Nick User is Offline
MBTI: ENFP
Age/Sex: M/34
Relationship:
IM:
Editor
Editor
Posts:350
Avatar

--
19 Mar 2011 07:26 AM  
Tooboku posted playfully in his original post. Caprice was the first to respond. When I read it then and re-read it just now, I choke. I find it, to borrow Caprice's words regarding what she disapproves of, to be "mean spirited".

Tooboku being playful in his first post? Can you not see that it was ambiguous enough to be taken the wrong way and even as offensive? I found it cringe worthy, and I can see by the responses of others, they did as well.

For goodness sake, this is a welcome thread. I think it would have been better for these biting posts from these three posters to have not been posted. Debate about playful jest to collect 90 virgins could have been in a debate thread, not a welcome thread. I hardly believe that tooboku would have responded the way he did had he not had three posters being so "unwelcoming". At least he was still playful; it could have been addressed in kind.
This is where the enlightenment comes in: you know certain posters enough that you don't find sting in their posts, but only humor. I know certain posters enough that I find their humor (and sting IF it is intended). So, perhaps it is a matter of familiarity and getting to know one another.

Having said that, I will say that I have perceived pricks and pokes and prods and stings, for what purpose, I don't know. I have done my best to ignore the slights, but they were felt.

I come back to this being a welcome thread. I do hope tooboku will return and I do hope that we will all have engaging, enlightening, and stimulating conversation with one another, playful jest, too.

Tooboku hasn't done himself many favors in his thread...

It seems to me that some INTJ's have the notion that they can say whatever they think, and because of this documented compatibility between INTJ's and ENFP's, we ENFP's will like everything they say. If these INTJ's want a positive response from ENFP's, they will need to put in some effort. All relationships require effort.

tooboku User is Offline
MBTI:
Age/Sex:
Relationship:
IM:
Posts:8
Avatar

--
20 Mar 2011 11:31 PM  

Meh.

If you want me to be completely honest, I didn't even want to join this poorly put together forum. The colour scheme hurts my eyes and overall it looks really incomplete... as if someone just threw it all together last minute, then found some other distraction and never got back to editing the stylesheets.


I'm just here to support my friend who was unfairly banned from another forum. Yes, INTJs have friends. Yes, we have feelings and just because you don't understand them, that doesn't mean they aren't there. We're just looking for a new place where someone who might understand that the title of the thread was a joke about the influx of new members and ergo the content of the first post was some sarcastic remark about what may possibly be going on in the mind of a fanatical invader. I did not know with such a blatantly obvious attempt at humour would be taken so seriously. Not only that, but a "typist" response as well. "Try the ISFJ forum". Seriously. You think that is being sensitive? You ask me to be sensitive to the ENFP's feelings after I've pretty much been rejected yet you make no consideration for the ISFJ. I also find it completely irrational for anyone to be offended after YOU reject someone and they reply with "I didn't want you anyway". Your Fi is just as broken as mine. Your Te is probably non-existant.

As per efforts to mend some sort of relationship here, there was none to begin with except for those between myself and those I knew prior to joining. I don't really care if you like me, but don't fuck around with my friends.

Anyway, you may all rejoice. One more invader has been vanquished. You guys aren't even worth the effort to login.

Danny User is Offline
MBTI: INTJ
Age/Sex: Both Apply
Relationship: Amicable
IM: IM, IM, IM . . Blonde!
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Posts:290
Avatar

--
21 Mar 2011 12:40 AM  

I did not intend to post in this thread again, but I have decided to do just that.

When tooboku arrived and playfully announced himself, I took it in good humor and spirit. I found the message in his humor to state he is an open individual and light hearted.

I was honestly horrified when Caprice responded so rudely to him, in of all places, a welcome thread. I, too, noticed the typism she emplyed--typism that several INTJs I know are very tired of. I attempted to "make light" of her heavy and rude and stinging remark to tooboku. I was concerned he wouldn't return after that post which certainly DID deter him.

Carprice was not the only one to employ typism in this thread, Lindzmarie followed suit.  And then Caprice said she was not one to point out inconsistencies, but she did say she was not one to degrade another human being, especially one she likes.  So, by that, her statements suggest she does not find tooboku to be either human, or "one she likes", thus he is not deserving of pleasantries normall afforded other new members.  Oh, the irony.

The "ganging up" on tooboku, in this welcome thread then ensued and was followed by attacks from Lindzmarie and Nick. The irony in these "attacks" on tooboku in his welcome thread lead,  rather than to apologies and accountability on the part of those attacking tooboku, but he was then further attacked for sticking up for himself even though it was done playfully wherein the "message" could have been heard and the attacks could have ceased.  The "playfulness" of his "pushback" would have allowed those insulting him to have saved face and moved on--but they chose not to, but rather they grew more hostile.

The "mean spirit" that Caprice mentions, is what she (and Nick and lindzmarie) employ against tooboku, but are unwilling to be honest about, let alone apologize for.  
(If you didn't appreciate his humorous OP, then why not leave it? Ignore it? Report it? )  Oh, the irony.


I have also read attack after attack after attack against the INTJs suggesting we (especially me) are mean spirited against the ENFP. I find this absolutely confounding. I went back and re-read my welcome thread. What I read over and over were "kind" remarks and "inviting" remarks that I made regarding the enfps. And for this I am accused of being narcissitic, selfish, and contemptuous regarding the feelings of ENFPs. Oh, the irony. The "untruth". Oh, the irony.

As another INTJ said to me today with great disappointment, "I guess we thought the ENFPs were all as good as Sakari". How wrong we were . . .

"She parts bullshit like the red sea. Amen." ~TheMorrigan to Danny
Sakari User is Offline
MBTI: ENFP
Age/Sex: Female
Relationship: Single
IM: sakariparadox
Cutest ENFP Ninja
Moderator
Moderator
Posts:753
Avatar

--
21 Mar 2011 07:16 AM  
I appreciate your input, Danny.

I believe the OP's intent was humorous--however, the members of the thread didn't know how to respond in such a way without revealing awkward personal details or ignoring it and moving on to a different topic. As a relevant response, one could have presented oneself as a) a virgin and willing, b) a non-virgin, or c) simply unwilling, all of which throws the thread into a rather uncomfortable situation. As far as I have witnessed, the members of this forum were not used to the teasing roleplay some of the INTJf members employ, and thus, without understanding the wide scope of the thread, found the only appropriate response was to attempt to deflect the attention away from them and onto another group.

I am glad you brought up the issue of typism--I don't think the forum as a whole has been exposed to the formal concept. We've discussed it some, but I don't think it was named. As such, I don't think the members of the forum were consciously aware of the issue. While some of the responses were typist, they also didn't seem to be overtly hostile--merely an attempt at banter that quickly devolved into a miscommunication between both sides. I think caprice and lindzmarie had the best of intentions and were not aware that what they posted could be taken as an attack, which is why feelings erupted over tooboku's response--while on the other hand, tooboku felt rejected and slighted, and subsequently justified in replying.

Hopefully both sides will see where the communication breakdown happened. I apologize, tooboku, for the perceived slights you received in this thread and hope this will not turn you off from the forum; I think you have valid insight and a refreshing humor. I also apologize to caprice and lindzmarie for the snubs they received, because I am sure they did not understand where tooboku was coming from.

And I definitely appreciate the indirect compliment, but I'm sure I'm not better than any other member of this forum. It really made my day, though!
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 3 << < 123


Active Forums 4.1
Find: ENFP Relationships, ENFP career advice and MBTI Chat. ENFP and INTJ, ENFP and INFJ, ENFP and INFP, ENFP and ESTP, ENFP and ESFP, ENFP and ISFP, ENFP and ISTP, ENFP and ISTJ Informaiton. enfp personality briggs careers meyers intj type infp relationships compatibility infj profile enfps career famous jobs love test entp intp forum match.

Downloaded from DNNSkins.com